theory - q1,q2,q3
This commit is contained in:
parent
277d5d2d4a
commit
076bc5efc6
6 changed files with 204 additions and 0 deletions
7
theory/Makefile
Normal file
7
theory/Makefile
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
.PHONY: clean
|
||||
|
||||
theory.pdf: $(wildcard *.tex)
|
||||
tectonic theory.tex
|
||||
|
||||
clean:
|
||||
rm theory.pdf
|
63
theory/question1.tex
Normal file
63
theory/question1.tex
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
|
|||
\section{Question 1}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Part A}
|
||||
|
||||
Linear 1st-order PDE is the equation
|
||||
$$ \sum_{i=1}^n a_i(x) \pdv{u}{x_i}(x) = f(x) $$
|
||||
which we consider for $x \in \Omega \subset \R^n$.
|
||||
By its solution we mean a continuously differentiable function $u(x)$ such that the previous equation holds pointwise for all $x \in \Omega$.
|
||||
|
||||
Characteristic system for this equation is a system of ODEs $\odv{x_i}{t}(t) = a_i(x(t))$ for $i = 1, \dots, N$ and $x \in \Omega$.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{theorem}[characterization of solutions of 1st order linear PDE]
|
||||
Function $\psi(x_1, \dots, x_N)$ is a solution for a linear homogeneous PDE if and only if it is constant along each of the solutions of the characteristic system.
|
||||
\end{theorem}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
$\Rightarrow$: Let $\psi$ be such that $\sum_{i=1}^N a_i(x) \odv{\psi(x)}{x_i} = 0$.
|
||||
Let $\{\varphi_1(t), \dots, \varphi_N(t)\}$ be one of its characteristics. Then
|
||||
$$ \odv*{\psi(\varphi_1(t),\dots,\varphi_N(t))}{t} = \sum_{i=1}^N \pdv{\psi}{x_i}(\varphi_1(t), \dots, \varphi_N(t)) \odv{\varphi_i(t)}{t} = $$
|
||||
$$ \sum_{i=1}^N \pdv{\psi}{x_i}(\varphi_1(t), \dots, \varphi_N(t)) a_i(\varphi_1(t), \dots, \varphi_N(t)) = 0. $$
|
||||
|
||||
$\Leftarrow$: Let $\psi$ be constant along every characteristic. Choose $\xi \in \Omega$. Since $\{a_i\}_{i=1}^N$ are continuous, at least one characteristic goes through the point $\xi$ which corresponds to some interval $(t_1, t_2)$. Fix such characteristic $(\varphi_1(t), \dots, \varphi_N(t))$ and a point $\tau$ such that $(\varphi_1(\tau), \dots, \varphi_N(\tau)) = (\xi_1, \dots, \xi_N)$.
|
||||
|
||||
Since $\psi(\varphi_1(t), \dots, \varphi_N(t))$ is constant on $(t_1, t_2)$, we have that
|
||||
$$ 0 = \odv{\psi}{t}(\varphi_1(t), \dots, \varphi_N(t)) = \sum_{i=1}^N \pdv{\psi}{x_i}(\varphi_1(t),\dots, \varphi_N(t))a_i(\varphi_1(t), \dots, \varphi_N(t)). $$
|
||||
Now it is sufficient to choose $t = \tau$ and we get that $\psi$ is a solution at point $\xi$. Since this point was chosen arbitrarily, we conclude that it is a solution on the entire $\Omega$.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Part B}
|
||||
|
||||
Fundamental solution of the Poisson equation is the function
|
||||
$$ \mathcal{E}(x) := \begin{cases} - \frac{1}{2\pi} \log |x|, N = 2;\\\frac{1}{(N - 2}\kappa_N|x|^{N - 2}, N \geq 3,\end{cases} $$
|
||||
where $\kappa_N$ is the measure of the $n$-dimensional unit ball.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{theorem}[Three Potentials Theorem]
|
||||
Let $\omega \subset \R^N$ be a bounded region with at least Lipschitz boundary, $u \in C^2(\bar \Omega)$ and $\mathcal{E}$ is the fundamental solution of the Poisson equation. Then for all $x \in \Omega$,
|
||||
$$ u(x) = -\int_\omega \mathcal{E}(x - y) \Delta u(y) dy + \int_{\delta\Omega} (\mathcal{E}(x - y) \pdv{u}{n}(y) - u(y) \pdv{\mathcal{E}}{n_y}(x - y)) dS(y), $$
|
||||
where
|
||||
$$ \pdv{u}{n}(y) := \nabla u(y) n(y), \pdv{\mathcal{E}}{n_y}(x - y) := \nabla_y \mathcal{E}(x - y) n(y) $$
|
||||
and $n$ is the outer normal to $\delta\Omega$.
|
||||
\end{theorem}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
Let $x \in \Omega$ and let $B_\varepsilon(x) \subset \Omega$. Let $V_\varepsilon := \Omega \setminus \overline{B_\varepsilon(x)}$. Using Green's theorem, we obtain
|
||||
$$ \int_{V_\varepsilon} \mathcal{E}(x - y)\Delta u(y) dy = \int_{V_\varepsilon} \delta_y \mathcal{E}(x - y) u(y) dy + \int_{\delta V_\varepsilon} \mathcal{E}(x - y)\pdv{u}{n}(y) dS(y) - $$
|
||||
$$ \int_{\delta V_\varepsilon} u(y) \pdv{\mathcal{E}}{n_y}(x - y)dS(y). $$
|
||||
Denote the individual integrals $I_1 = I_2 + I_3 - I_4$ and send $\varepsilon$ to zero.
|
||||
|
||||
First we can write (the functions in question are ``nice" enough)
|
||||
$$I_1 \to \int_{\Omega} \mathcal{E}(x - y)\Delta u(y) dy$$
|
||||
|
||||
$I_2$ is obviously zero (fundamental solution).
|
||||
|
||||
$I_3$ we can rewrite in the following manner:
|
||||
$$ I_3 = \int_{\delta \Omega} \mathcal{E}(x - y)\pdv{u}{n}(y) dS(y) - \int_{\delta B_\varepsilon(x)} \mathcal{E}(x - y)\pdv{u}{n}(y) dS(y) \to $$
|
||||
$$ \int_{\delta \Omega} \mathcal{E}(x - y)\pdv{u}{n}(y) dS(y). $$
|
||||
|
||||
For the last integral, we can write
|
||||
$$ I_4 = \int_{\delta \Omega} u(y) \pdv{\mathcal{E}}{n_y}(x - y)dS(y) - \int_{\delta B_\varepsilon(x)} u(y) \pdv{\mathcal{E}}{n_y}(x - y)dS(y) \to $$
|
||||
$$ \int_{\delta \Omega} u(y) \pdv{\mathcal{E}}{n_y}(x - y)dS(y) + u(x). $$
|
||||
|
||||
From this follows the equality in question.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
46
theory/question2.tex
Normal file
46
theory/question2.tex
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
|||
\section{Question 2}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Part A}
|
||||
|
||||
Functions $u_1(x_1, \dots, x_n), u_2(x_1, \dots, x_N), u_n(x_1, \dots, x_N)$ are dependent on the set $\bar O$ ($O$ is open and bounded), if there exists a continuously differentiable function $F(u_1, \dots, u_n)$ such that
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item $F$ is not identically zero on any region $G \subset \R^n$.
|
||||
\item for all $x = (x_1, \dots, x_N) \in \bar O$ we have that $F(u_1(x), \dots, u_n(x)) = 0$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{theorem}[Jacobi's criterion for function dependence]
|
||||
Let $\Omega \subset \R^N$ be open, $u_i \in C^1(\Omega)$ for $i = 1,\dots,N$. Then $u_1(x), \dots, u_n(x)$ are dependent in $\Omega$ if and only if
|
||||
$$ J_u(x) = \det
|
||||
\begin{pmatrix}
|
||||
\pdv{u_1(x)}{x_1} & \cdots & \pdv{u_1(x)}{x_N} \\
|
||||
\vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
|
||||
\pdv{u_N(x)}{x_1} & \cdots & \pdv{u_N(x)}{x_N}
|
||||
\end{pmatrix} = 0.
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\end{theorem}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{theorem}[Dependence of $N$ solutions]
|
||||
Let $\psi_1, \dots, \psi_N$ be solutions of a non-trivial linear homogeneous 1st-order PDE in $\Omega \subset \R^N$. Then they are dependent in $\Omega$.
|
||||
\end{theorem}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
Assume that $\psi_1, \dots, \psi_N$ are not dependent in $\Omega$. Then there exists a point $x_0 \in \Omega$ such that $J_\psi(x_0) \neq 0$. From continuity of solutions we have that the determinant in question is non-zero on some neighborhood $U(x_0)$. This implies that the system
|
||||
$ \begin{pmatrix}
|
||||
\pdv{u_1(x)}{x_1} & \cdots & \pdv{u_1(x)}{x_N} \\
|
||||
\vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
|
||||
\pdv{u_N(x)}{x_1} & \cdots & \pdv{u_N(x)}{x_N}
|
||||
\end{pmatrix} y = 0 $
|
||||
only has a trivial solution, which is in contradiction with the assumption that our original PDE was non-trivial.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Part B}
|
||||
|
||||
Consider the following problem: $\pdv[order={2}]{v(t, x; s)}{t} - c^2\pdv[order={2}]{v(t, x; s)}{x} = 0$, $v(s, x; s) = 0$ and $\pdv{f(t, x; s)}{t}_{t=s} = f(t, x)$.
|
||||
|
||||
Then $u(t, x) := \int_0^t v(t, x; s)ds$ solves general wave equation with RHS $f$.
|
||||
|
||||
For $N = 1$ we have $v(t, x; s) = \frac{1}{2c}\int_{B_{c(t-s)}(x)} f(s, y)dy$ and thus
|
||||
$$ u(t, x) = \frac{1}{2c} \int_0^t \int_{x-c(t-s)}^{x+c(t-s)}f(s, y) dy ds = \frac{1}{2c} \int_0^t \int_{x-c\tau}^{x+c\tau} f(t - \tau, y)dy d\tau. $$
|
||||
|
||||
For $N = 2$ we have $v(t, x; s) = \frac{1}{2\pi c} \int_{B_{c(t-s)}(x)} \frac{f(s, y)}{\sqrt{c^2(t-s)^2}-|y-x|^2} dy$.
|
||||
Thus $$u(t, x) = \frac{1}{2\pi c} \int_{B_{c(t-s)}(x)} \frac{f(s, y)}{\sqrt{c^2(t-s)^2}-|y-x|^2} dy ds.$$
|
49
theory/question3.tex
Normal file
49
theory/question3.tex
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
|
|||
\section{Question 3}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Part A}
|
||||
|
||||
Linear 1st-order PDE is the equation
|
||||
$$ \sum_{i=1}^n a_i(x) \pdv{u}{x_i}(x) = f(x) $$
|
||||
which we consider for $x \in \Omega \subset \R^n$.
|
||||
By its solution we mean a continuously differentiable function $u(x)$ such that the previous equation holds pointwise for all $x \in \Omega$.
|
||||
|
||||
Functions $u_1(x_1, \dots, x_n), u_2(x_1, \dots, x_N), u_n(x_1, \dots, x_N)$ are dependent on the set $\bar O$ ($O$ is open and bounded), if there exists a continuously differentiable function $F(u_1, \dots, u_n)$ such that
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item $F$ is not identically zero on any region $G \subset \R^n$.
|
||||
\item for all $x = (x_1, \dots, x_N) \in \bar O$ we have that $F(u_1(x), \dots, u_n(x)) = 0$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
Let $\psi_1, \dots, \psi_{N-1}$ are solutions of the 1st-order PDE. For every subregion $\Omega' \subset \Omega$ let there be a point $x_0 \in \Omega'$ such that the matrix
|
||||
$$ \begin{pmatrix}\pdv{\psi_1}{x_1} & \cdots & \pdv{\psi_1}{x_N}\\
|
||||
\vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
|
||||
\pdv{\psi_{N-1}}{x_1} & \cdots & \pdv{\psi_{N-1}}{x_N} \end{pmatrix}$$
|
||||
has rank $N - 1$. Then $\psi_1, \psi_{N-1}$ make the fundamental system of the linear PDE.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{theorem}[Maximum Number of Independent Solutions]
|
||||
Let there exist a point $x \in \Omega'$ for every subregion $\Omega' \subset \Omega$ such that $\sum |a_i(x)| > 0$. Let $\psi_1, \dots, \psi_{N-1}$ be the fundamental system of said PDE. Then $\theta \in C^1(\Omega)$ solves the PDE iff $\psi_1, \dots, \psi_{N - 1}, \theta$ are dependent in $\Omega$.
|
||||
\end{theorem}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
$\implies$ was already proven before
|
||||
$\impliedby$: We assume that $J_{\vec\psi, \theta} = 0$. Therefore the system
|
||||
$y_1\pdv{\psi_1}{x_i} + \dots + y_{N-1}\pdv{\psi_{N-1}}{x_i} + y_N\pdv{\theta}{x_i} = 0$ for $i=1, \dots, N$ has a non-trivial solution for every $x \in \Omega$. Multiplying this equation by $a_i(x)$ and summing all of the together gives us
|
||||
$$ \sum_j y_j(x)\sum_i a_i(x)\pdv{\psi_j}{x_i} + y_N(x) \sum_i a_i(x) \pdv{\theta}{x_i} = 0. $$
|
||||
Since $\psi_i$ solve the equation, we get that
|
||||
$$ y_N(x) \sum_i a_i(x) \pdv{\theta}{x_i} = 0. $$
|
||||
Assume that $\theta$ does not solve are equation. Therefore we have an $x_0$ such that $\sum_{i=1}^N a_i(x_0)\pdv{\theta(x_0)}{x_i} \neq 0$.
|
||||
By the usual notion of continuity we get that there exists a neighborhood of $x_0$ where this formula is non-zero. Therefore $y_N = 0$ on some $U(x_0)$. Therefore $y_1\pdv{\psi_1}{x_i} + \dots + y_{N-1}\pdv{\psi_{N-1}}{x_i} = 0$. Since all the original functions are independent, there is a point $x_1$ where the system only has a trivial solution and we get that $J_{\vec\phi, \theta}(x_1) \neq 0$, which contradicts our assumption of independence.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Part B}
|
||||
|
||||
Consider the following system: $-\Delta u = f$ on some $\Omega$, $u = g$ on $\delta\Omega$. If $\Omega$ is bounded, we talk about the inner Dirichlet problem, if $\R^n \setminus \bar \Omega$ is bounded, we talk about the outer Dirichlet problem (in this case we only care about functions $u(x) = O\left(\frac{1}{|x|^{N - 2}}\right)$ for $|x| \to \infty$.
|
||||
|
||||
For the uniqueness of the solution for the inner problem, we only need to prove that the zero problem for $f = g = 0$ only has the trivial solution $u = 0$, which in fact follows from the weak maximum principle ($0 = \min_{\delta\Omega} u = \min_\Omega u \leq \max_\Omega u = \max_{\delta\Omega} u = 0$).
|
||||
|
||||
Now we shall prove the uniqueness for the outer problem. Assume that $u_1$ and $u_2$ are two solutions. Then $u_1 - u_2 =: w$ solves
|
||||
$\Delta w = 0$ on $\Omega$, $w = 0$ on the boundary and, $w(x) = O\left(\frac{1}{|x|^{N-2}}\right)$.
|
||||
|
||||
First assume that $N \geq 3$, therefore $w(x) \to 0$ as $|x|$ goes to infinity. Let $x_0 \in \Omega$ and $\varepsilon > 0$ be given. Then there exists $R > 0$ such that $x_0, G \subset B_R$, where $G := \R^N \setminus \bar\Omega$ and $|w| \leq \varepsilon$ on $\delta B_R$. Now apply the maximum principle for the set $\Omega_R := \Omega \cup B_R$. We have that $w \leq \varepsilon$ on $\Omega_R$. The same can be said for $-w$, which means that we are done.
|
||||
|
||||
Let now $N = 2$. WLOG let the origin be in $G := \R^N \setminus \bar\Omega$. Fix an open ball $B_R \subset G$. Define a mapping $F: \R^N \setminus \{0\} \to \R^N \setminus \{0\}$ defined as $F(x) = x' := \frac{xR^2}{|x|^2}$. This means that $x$ and $F(x)$ lie on the same half-line originating in the origin. Then $F$ maps $\Omega$ to some region $\Omega^* \subset B_R$, in fact, $F(\Omega) = \Omega^* \setminus \{0\}$. Define $w'(x') = w(F^{-1}(x')) = w(x)$. Obviously $w' = 0$ on $\delta\Omega^*$. We will show that $w'$ is harmonic on $\Omega^* \setminus \{0\}$. Set $r = |x|$ ad $\rho = |x'|$. Then set
|
||||
$\tilde w(r, \phi) = w(x_1, x_2)$ and $\tilde w'(\rho, \phi') = w'(x_1', x_2')$ and moving to the polar coordinates we get the desired equality. Now the function is obviously bounded, therefore we can extend it harmonically. By what was already proven for the inner problem, this means that $w' = 0$, which in turn implies that $w = 0$ on $\bar \Omega$.
|
BIN
theory/theory.pdf
Normal file
BIN
theory/theory.pdf
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
39
theory/theory.tex
Normal file
39
theory/theory.tex
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
|||
\documentclass{article}
|
||||
|
||||
\usepackage{polyglossia}
|
||||
\usepackage{amsmath}
|
||||
\usepackage{amssymb}
|
||||
\usepackage{amsthm}
|
||||
\usepackage{enumerate}
|
||||
\usepackage[hidelinks]{hyperref}
|
||||
\usepackage{derivative}
|
||||
|
||||
\overfullrule=1mm
|
||||
|
||||
\theoremstyle{plain}
|
||||
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
|
||||
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
|
||||
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
|
||||
\newtheorem{observation}[theorem]{Observation}
|
||||
|
||||
\theoremstyle{definition}
|
||||
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
|
||||
\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}
|
||||
\newtheorem{convention}[theorem]{Convention}
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand*{\R}{\mathbb{R}}
|
||||
\newcommand*{\N}{\mathbb{N}}
|
||||
|
||||
\title{Introduction to partial differential equations (NMMA339) -- theory}
|
||||
\author{Petr Velička \footnote{\href{mailto:petrvel@matfyz.cz}{petrvel@matfyz.cz}}\\lecturer: prof. Mgr. Milan Pokorný, Ph.D., DSc. \footnote{\href{mailto:pokorny@karlin.mff.cuni.cz}{pokorny@karlin.mff.cuni.cz}}}
|
||||
\date{LS 2024/25}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
\maketitle
|
||||
|
||||
\include{question1}
|
||||
\include{question2}
|
||||
\include{question3}
|
||||
|
||||
\end{document}
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue